Tampilkan postingan dengan label Remakes. Tampilkan semua postingan
Tampilkan postingan dengan label Remakes. Tampilkan semua postingan

Jumat, 09 Juli 2010

The Revenge's 2nd Anniversary Blog-A-Palooza


Today marks the 2nd Anniversary of Caliban's Revenge, and I had my sister bake me a cake just for the occasion. Mmmm-mmmm, Bedelia!

Actually, I do wish my sister would make me a zombie cake. She hasn't done one, as far as know, but she's getting pretty good and with the right design, I'd bet she do a kick-ass job, too. And since this is the 2nd time I've mentioned zombie cakes and how great I think she'd be at making them, I hope she gets the hint and has a zombie-riffic surprise waiting for m ethe next time I come to visit.

Anyway, since this the Official Anniversary of the blog, I thought it would be fun to revisit and update the very first post I ever wrote, long before I learned how to embed videos, add pictures and create hyperlinks. You can revisit the original, primitive post here, if you want to compare. I'm going last to first, this time and I've beefed up the commentary quite a bit, in addition to adding as much video as possible and links to the original films' posters and stills. My writing style has also changed quite a bit in the last two years, as I have become more comfortable revealing more about myself with my readers.

Of course, if it weren't for Caliban's Revenge, I never would have 'met' the fabulous Stephen Rader; the free-spirited Post Apocalyptic Bohemian or the adorable (and currently CBF*-afflicted) Sean at Just a Jeep Guy, all of whom were among my first followers and all of whom I have come to think of as friends. The Fates only know what would happen if we all got together in the flesh at the same piano bar -- some sort of rainbow-leather-unicorn-spandex-bearsplosion, probably. Or a brand-new version of "The Golden Girls." I'd have to be Dorothy, I guess.

*Carol Brady Flip, poor thing. BTW - Who the hell even imagined that Florence Effing Henderson created the mullet? Damn you and your Wesson oil, woman!

I know I complain about sequels and remakes all the time, but there are some movies that deserve a second (or third) version for modern audiences. And with that in mind, here are:

Ten Fantasy/Horror/Sci-Fi Movies that Should be Remade.

10. Logan's Run - 1976.

Based on the novel co-authored by William F. Nolan and George Clayton Johnson, Logan's Run is a dystopian tale about a hedonistic 23rd Century society which values youth and beauty above all else. At birth, each citizen is given a palm implant which turns red upon it's wearer's 30th birthday (21st, in the book), whereupon they are to report to something called 'Carousel' for Re-birthing. Those who try to escape Carousel are called Runners and the special police assigned to catch them are called Sandmen. Logan is a Sandman who falls in love and becomes a Runner. The movie starred Michael York; Jenny Agutter; Richard Jordan; Farrah Fawcett and Peter Ustinov. It won an Academy Award for its by-now-not-so-special effects, but was hardly the definitive version of the novel. Lots of attractive, scantily-clad people don't hurt.



How to Fix It:
Go back to the source material. Nolan and Johnson haven't exactly written a masterpiece, but the book is so much more compelling that the screenplay by David Goodman. Hire David Goyer for the re-write.

Who Should Star:
Zac Efron as Logan; Dakota Fanning as Jessica; Taylor Lautner as Francis; a sober Lindsay Lohan as Holly and Robin Williams as The Old Man.

Directed By:
Stephen Spielberg. No one handles thoughtful Sci-Fi like he does. If he keeps the CGI to a minimum and approaches it from it's most human level, it could be one his many masterpieces.

Remake Prognosis:
This property has been kicking around for almost 40 years. I'll believe it when I see it.

9. The Hobbit - 1977

This Rankin-Bass adaptation of Tokien's LOTR prequel featured a premiere cast of voice artists (including the astonishing performance artist Brother Theodore as Gollum). Of course, we all know that Mexican auteur Guillermo del Toro has moved on as director of the Peter Jackson produced live-action version and ridiculous rumors abound on the Net about where the project is headed.



How to Fix It:
Jackson and his team have already been at work on a screenplay. In order to make it stylistically consistent with Jackson's trilogy, the obvious thing for him to do is direct it himself.

Who Should Star:
Obviously Ian McKellen, Andy Sirkus and Cate Blanchett should reprise their roles, though I would probably cast a complete unknown as Bilbo.

Remake Prognosis:
Fair to Middling.

8. The Haunting - 1963

I know - blasphemy, right? Well, nothing could be more blasphemous to Robert Wise's brilliant and terrifying adaptation of Shirley Jackson's "The Haunting of Hill House" than Jan DeBont's beyond-atrocious 1999 remake. Julie Harris, Russ Tamblyn and Claire Bloom lead the cast of Wise's pants-poopingly scary movie, while Liam Neeson, Catherine Zeta Jones and Lily Taylor head up the ridiculous remake.





How to Fix It:
Again, it boils down to the source. Jackson is one of maybe four authors who have actually managed to keep me awake at night. How hard can it be?

Who Should Star:
Toni Collette as Eleanor; Scarlett Johanssen as Theo; Justin Long as Luke and George Clooney as Dr. Markway.

Who Should Direct:
This is the perfect project for a post-Spider-Man Sam Raimi.

Remake Prognosis:
Unlikely

7. The Exorcist - 1973

William Friedkin's masterpiece has been called the "Scariest Movie of All Time," by more than one critic, blogger or movie fan. I have to disagree. If you are a Christian (and in particular a Catholic), I can understand how this movie may have affected you. But by the time I saw it (six years after its original release), I had pretty much concluded that the Devil was bullcrap and I found myself oddly unaffected. I did attend a screening of the 25th Anniversary Edition, which included the infamous "spider-walk" sequence, though I had much the same reaction. I think it was the obviously fake head-spin that did me in.



How To Fix It:
Replace Dick Smith's then state-of-the-art physical makeup effects with limited, quality CGI.

Who Should Star:
Chloe Moretz as Regan; Sandra Bullock as her mother, Chris; Jayma Mays as Sharon; Patrick Stewart as Father Merrin and Skeet Ulrich as Father Karras.

Who Should Direct:
Ridley Scott.

Remake Prognosis:
Highly Unlikely

6. Sisters - 1973

This early Brian DePalma film involves a pair of once-conjoined twins, one of whom is homicidal. A pre-Superman Margot Kidder stars in DePalma's first, low-budget attempt at an Hitchcockian thriller.



How To Fix It:
A real budget would help. And a script from someone like Christopher McQuarrie wouldn't hurt.

Who Should Star:
As Danielle and Dominique, Anne Hathaway could finally break away from the good girl roles that have defined her career so far.

Who Should Direct:
This is the perfect opportunity for Adrian Lynne to make a comeback.

Remake Prognosis:
Fairly Unlikely

5. Fahrenheit 451 - 1966

Director Frank Darabont continues to list this film among his upcoming projects, though there as been little progress on the project in several years. The original adaptation of Ray Bradbury's dystopian novel, directed by French auteur Francois Truffaut is a sterile, joyless film which somehow misses the point (and homespun appeal) of Bradbury's celebration of literature.



How To Fix It:
For the third time in this post, I suggest a return to the source. This future may be dystopian, but Bradbury's style is what makes the story so compelling.

Who Should Star:
Jude Law as Fireman Montag and Francis O'Connor as Clarisse/Linda.

Who Should Direct:
If Darabont never gets to do it, then Darren Aronofsky should be able to handle this subtly dense material.

Remake Prognosis:
It all depends on Darabont, though I suspect this one is likely a go, soon.

4. The Shining - 1980 & 1997

Neither Stanley Kubrick's 1980 adaptation nor Mick Garris' 1997 TV version fully capture the sheer terror of Stephen King's novel about a haunted hotel in Colorado and the family drawn into it's evil. While making a fine film, Kubrick's version is miles away from what King wrote, and while Farris' TV version is closer to the source, it still lacks the sense of dread King manages to build in the novel.



How To Fix It:
Once again, I have to go with the source. King is among those few who keep me awake, and "The Shining" is one of the first novels to do that to me. A Darabont-scripted adaption would rock the house.

Who Should Star:
Josh Brolin as Jack, Jennifer Garner as Wendy, Johnny Knoxville as Floyd and an unknown adorable moppet as Danny.

Who Should Direct:
Darabont's track-record with King's material is without par.

Remake Prognosis:
Unlikely

3. Excalibur - 1981

John Boorman's take on the Arthurian legend is a gorgeous (if languid) version of "The Once and Future King," starring Nigel Terry; Helen Mirren; Gabriel Byrne; Nicol Williamson; Liam Neeson; Patrick Stewart and the almost beatific Nicholas Clay, is lovely to look at, if nothing else.



How To Fix It:
How many times do I need to say it? Source, source, source.

Who Should Star:
This is a really difficult one. Rufus Sewell as Arthur (?); Jude Law as Lancelot; Jake Gyllenhall as Gawain; Gwenneth Paltrow as Guenevere and Johnny Depp as Merlin.

Who Should Direct:
Since del Toro is off The Hobbit...

Remake Prognosis:
Not after the epic fail that was Robin Hood.

2. Ghost Story - 1981

Author Peter Straub's brilliantly layered novel of ancient evil was given short shrift in the 1981 movie which explored only one aspect of the novel's complex plot. The ancient cast of venerables still held some level of relevance in 1981 and included Fred Astaire; Melvyn Douglas; Douglas Fairbanks, Jr. and John Houseman. Almost-was Craig Wasson was the young hero, while future Borg Queen and genre fave Alice Krige marked her feature debut. Larry Cohen's screenplay lacks the depth and intensity of Straub's novel, while John Irvin's direction is workman-like, at best.



How to Fix It:
Um... hello? Have you been reading this post? Peter Straub is the author and/or co-author of four of my all-time favorite novels (we'll save those** for another post) and "Ghost Story" proved to be one of the most complex and original horror novels I had ever read.

Who Should Star:
Robert Redford; Clint Eastwood; Hal Holbrook; James Garner; Dominick West and Cate Blanchett.

Who Should Direct:
Calling Mr. Fincher. Mr. David Fincher? I have a suggestion for a David Fincher...

Remake Prognosis:
As if...


1. Something Wicked This Way Comes - 1983

A very special English teacher by the name of Jack Fogarty introduced me the works of Arthur Conan Doyle; Agatha Christie and Ray Bradbury when I was 13 or so, just about the age of Bradbury's protagonist in the novel. Having grown up attending the NJ State Fair and spending day trips on the boardwalk at Seaside Heights, my affinity for carnivals was set in place as firmly as my father's love of classic horror movies. When I read the book (the very first I was able to dissect, academically), I pictured myself as young Will, fighting against forces he can't possibly understand with only the power of his father's love to protect him. Disney's disappointing film version stars Jason Robards, Jonathan Price, Diane Ladd, Royal Dano and Pam Greer and (much like Ghost Story), barely grazes the surface of Bradbury's novel.



How to Fix It:
Nope. Not gonna say it again.

Who Should Star:
Kelsey Grammer as Will's Dad; Alan Rickman as Mr. Dark; Jim Carrey as Tom Fury; Diane Lane as Mrs. Nightshade; Beyonce as the Dust Witch and two young unknowns as Will and Jim.

Who Should Direct:
Guillermo del Toro would have a field day with this material.

Remake Prognosis:
I heard some early rumblings about a remake a few years back, but Disney has been pretty quiet on the subject. Maybe if the Tron sequel is a hit...

So, what do you think? Agree? Disagree? Did I miss something you'd like to see redone? Over the next few days, I'll be revisiting several old posts as part of the Anniversary Celebration. Check them out and let me know what you think. You know I love hearing from you.

More, anon.
Prospero

** 4 of my 10 favorite novels: Ghost Story; Shadowland; Floating Dragon; The Talisman


Read More......

Kamis, 01 April 2010

Fan-Freaking-Tastic


Last year, I posted an April Fools joke on April 1st. I considered it this year -- I thought maybe a fake movie review or something. But then I realized that the entire Internet was full of April Fools posts, so I decided against it.

Instead, I'm posting about yet another remake of yet another Sci-Fi movie classic. Variety is reporting that director Paul Greengrass (The Bourne Supremacy) is slated to helm a (sigh) 3D remake of the 1966 classic Fantastic Voyage. Starring 60's B-listers Stephen Boyd; Raquel Welch; Donald Pleasance; Arthur Kennedy; Arthur O'Connell and Edmond O'Brien, Fantastic Voyage is the story of a group of doctors who are shrunk down to microscopic proportions and injected into the bloodstream of a near-death diplomat whose survival is vital to world peace.

Pre-dating nanotechnology by 40 years, the movie's "micronauts" make their way through the diplomat's body toward his brain, in an attempt to repair damage that was caused by an assassination attempt. Using then state-of-the-art special effects, the team and their ship (The Proteus) travel through the diplomat's vascular system, encountering thunderous heartbeats, turbulent rises in blood pressure and an attack by antibodies on their trip to the brain, where they use a laser to repair the damaged tissue. Of course, the antibody attack was simply an excuse to have Ms Welch in a skin-tight diving outfit. Pleasance plays the bad guy while Boyd and Welch provide the eye-candy. Science Fiction legend Isaac Asimov went on to write the movie's novelization, fixing several flaws inherent in the original script.

To be honest, I am not all that upset by this particular remake. The original is hokey and while it may have been cutting-edge in 1966, it hasn't really aged all that well.



Honestly, if anyone can do justice to a remake, it's Greengrass. He's already proven his skills at making exciting, tension-filled movies. And advances in biology, medicine, nanotechnology and visual effects can only improve upon the original. Of course, the whole 3D thing makes me crazy. Yes, I know we're probably stuck with it until true holographic 3D movies arrive, but it seems like every Sci-Fi, Fantasy and Horror movie slated for production in the next two years is going to be in 3D. And while the new optical 3D is certainly better than the old 2-color process, I for one see no real advantage in 3D filmmaking. If Avatar is any indicator, 3D obviously does nothing to enhance what all of the best movies have in common: great stories, terrific acting, intelligent writing and honest direction. Truth be told, give me Casablanca over Piranha 3D, any day.

More, anon.
Prospero


Read More......

Kamis, 18 Maret 2010

Clash of the Trite Ones


That's flavor-of-the-month Sam Worthington, late of Avatar in his next blockbuster role as Perseus in the upcoming remake of Clash of the Titans.

Your Uncle P is (sadly) old enough to have seen the original 1981 Desmond Davis version on the big screen. I saw it with my sister and we were both very excited. We grew up on movies featuring the amazing stop-motion special effects of the master, Ray Harryhausen. The movie starred a little-known stage actor named Harry Hamlin as Perseus and a slew of former A-listers which included Maggie Smith, Claire Bloom, Ursula Andress and Burgess Meredith. It also starred the incomparable Laurence Olivier at what is assuredly the nadir of his long and illustrious career.

Much like Disney's animated Hercules, the story is a total bastardization of the Greek mythology. In this version, Perseus must rescue the princess Andromeda from the clutches of the evil Calibos, assisted by the mechanical owl, Bubo (a lame attempt to attract kids who loved the the chirping, whistling droid R2D2 from Star Wars). Perseus tames the wild, winged horse Pegasus; battles the snake-headed Medusa and even fights a Kraken (a beast from Norse mythology!). The script, by Beverly Cross (Jason and the Argonauts) is ridiculous (why would one impose Norse mythology on a movie about Greek mythology?); the acting is laughable and the special effects? Well... let's just say they're not-so-special. Yet, somehow, it's become a classic. I suspect it's because most of the people who love it were children when they saw it and their memories of it probably don't live up to the actual thing. I was 20 when it came out and my sister was 14. Both of us immediately saw through its nonsense and declared it "Clash of the Trite Ones," a name we still use for the movie. See for yourself:



Hamlin was almost pretty then, wasn't he?

Of course, Hollywood, being the unimaginative pit of crap it's become in the last 30 years, felt the need to remake this steaming pile of cinematic excrement, using modern CGI and 3D. This time, Worthington takes on the role of Perseus, and a whole new cast of former A-listers are on hand, including Ralph Fiennes; Liam Neesom; Pete Postlethwaite and my current favorite vampire, Danny Huston.



Bigger and louder, though I fear equally as stupid, Clash of the Titans is due for release in IMAX 3D on April 2nd, despite what that trailer says. Will I see it? Probably. I've always been a sucker for Sword & Sandal & Sorcery epics. And I have two Re-Admit passes from Avatar being snowed out. Though I doubt I will like it any better than the original. Maybe someday someone will make a movie that's actually true to the old mythological tales. I suppose someone other than myself must own a copy of Bulfinch's Mythology. But I'm not holding my breath...

More, anon.
Prospero

Read More......

Jumat, 26 Februari 2010

I'm Your Boyfriend Now, Bitch!


There's a new trailer out for the 'reboot" (oh, how I hate that word) of A Nightmare on Elm Street, the 1984 Wes Craven classic that starred Heather Langencamp, John Saxon, Ronee Blakely, Charles "Roger Rabbit" Fleischer and Robert Englund as the pedophile Fred Kreuger (it wasn't until the film's sequel that he was officially called "Freddy"). Oh yeah, it also starred this young unknown by the name of Johnny Depp, in his feature film debut (more on Johnny in my upcoming post about Tim Burton's Alice in Wonderland).

In the movie, a small town's teenagers suddenly find themselves plagued by nightmares in which a horribly burn-scarred maniac stalks them with a razor-clawed glove. It turns out their parents had long-ago stalked and killed a local pedo, burning him alive in the high school boiler room, where he had been employed as a janitor. Years later, Freddy manages to invade the dreams of their children, taking advantage of the old urban legend that says if you die in your dream, you die in real life.

The movie was a sensation and spawned almost as many sequels as Friday the 13th, ending with 2003's Freddy vs Jason, a campy mix in which the two unstoppable Horror icons joined forces to take out local teens, but ended up battling each other for supremacy. Beyond silly, Freddy vs Jason was the nadir of both franchises, both of which should have been put to bed long ago (despite the calls for an Ash vs Freddy vs Jason sequel, which, thankfully, never happened).

As a young (23 - yes, I'm old) Horror fan who, at the time, adored 80's slasher flicks, I found the first film to be both original and effective, and Fred Kreuger was probably the most frightening Horror movie villain since Craven's mutant cannibal family in the original The Hills Have Eyes. Of course, as the franchise progressed and Freddy became an increasingly campy spouter of bad one-liners, I began to lose interest. That is, until Craven returned with 1994's A New Nightmare, which pitted Langencamp as herself, battling the fictional Kreuger made real through her son's own nightmares. The movie explored the fine line between fiction and reality, but fell apart in its last few minutes. And Craven's next film, the terrible Eddy Murphy vehicle A Vampire in Brooklyn seemed to seal his fate as a has-been. It wouldn't be until the Kevin Williamson-penned slasher satire Scream that Craven would redeem himself. I'm also a big fan of Craven's non-Horror thriller Red Eye, with Rachel McAdams, Cillian Murphy, Brian Cox and giant-eyed "Glee" star, Jayma Mays.

And Craven's next film, My Soul to Take, seems to explore familiar territory in a tale about a serial killer who returns to his hometown to stalk children whose birthday's fall on the day he was supposedly buried. How much more can Craven mine from this concept? I'm not sure, but you can bet I'll be seeing it.

Anyway, here's the latest trailer for director Wesley Strick's "reboot" of A Nightmare...



Is it me, or does Jackie Earle Haley's version of Freddy sound an awful lot like Watchmen's Rorschach? At least this version of Freddy looks like he's actually been burned, rather than ravaged by some exotic, disfiguring virus. And yes, that's doe-eyed Kyle Gallner from The Haunting in Connecticut and Jennifer's Body as Quentin. I'll withhold judgment until I see the new movie when it comes out in April, but I remain dubious. If nothing else, I'll give it this: At least the damned thing isn't in 3D!

More, anon.
Prospero

Read More......

Minggu, 06 Desember 2009

Oops, They Did It Again

That's the "Ned Flanders" (i.e. not much to look at until he removes his clothes) of Hollywood, Alan Tudyk ("Dollhouse;" "Firefly:" "V") in Death at a Funeral, a 2007 comedy directed by Frank Oz. The movie, written by Dean Craig, is an outrageously funny look at the family secrets that come out after one dies. In this particular shot, Tudyk's character has taken what he believes is a Valium but is in reality, an hallucinogen. In the movie (WARNING - Spoilers ahead), the family patriarch has died and it comes to light that not only was he gay, but he had been having an affair with a Little Person (The Station Master's Peter Dinklage). I loved this movie when I saw it and urged everyone I knew to see it, as well.

Of course, Hollywood, being run by CPA's* rather than artistic visionaries, hired Craig to write a new version, starring a primarily African American cast, headed by Chris Rock; Martin Lawrence; Tracy Morgan; Danny Glover; Loretta Devine and Zoe Saldana. Of course, Luke Wilson and James Marsden are on hand as the token white men. Directed by Neil LaBute (In the Company of Men and the painfully bad remake of The Wicker Man, starring Nicholas Cage), the 2010 version looks just awful (though I must admit I don't mind seeing Marsden in the Tudyk role...).

Let's compare, shall we? Here's the trailer for the original:



And here's the trailer for the American version:



All I keep asking myself is: Why? And almost as important: Is Peter Dinklage the only Little Person working in movies? Why would he even agree to appear as the same character in a lame remake of a movie he'd already done?

Symptomatic of the problems that are inherent in most Hollywood movies today, the remake of Death at a Funeral is just another reminder of the sad state of modern American Cinema. There are loads of writers out there with original stories to tell. And there are loads of directors with original visions to commit to celluloid. Why should a once-promising director like LaBute be given a chance to remake yet another British classic, when he failed so spectacularly with The Wicker Man? Meanwhile, struggling writers with original ideas are reduced to peddling their scripts to independent filmmakers in the hope that they'll make a splash at Sundance or the Toronto Film Film Festival.

Yes, Hollywood has always been about making a profit. Every business is. But it also used to be about allowing people with vision to make original works of art that resonated with people around the world. It's so sad to see an industry that used to dominate the rest of world, reduced to making poor copies of what the rest of world produces.

I will not be seeing the new version of Death at a Funeral and I urge you to join me in boycotting what promises to be an unfunny mess. And yes, I know that remakes have been around almost as long as the industry itself. Hell, even DeMille remade The Ten Commandments, and A Star is Born is scheduled for its fourth incarnation. Still... I'd rather sit through an original film than a lame remake, any day. Sadly, until the sheep that most movie-goers are wake up and smell the disappointment, we'll be subjected to more of this kind of crap. And I will continue to gripe about it. 'Nuff said.

By the way, Uncle Prospero had a rather exciting phone call late last week, and may well have some very big news in the next coming weeks. Please keep your fingers, toes, eyes and any other body part you can, crossed for me. I'll let you know as soon as I can.

More, anon.
Prospero

*Prospero in no way intends to mean that all CPAs are morons. Only those who are currently running the big Hollywood studios.

Read More......

Selasa, 01 Desember 2009

Finally, a Movie Worth Re-Making


In 1979, Disney was in trouble. After Walt died, the studio's standards had fallen and they hadn't had a hit in ages. In a desperate attempt to capitalize on the Sci-Fi craze that had been generated by Star Wars and Close Encounters of the The Third Kind, they assembled a crack team of B-List stars, a former sit-com director (whose only hit movie was the original Freaky Friday, starring the reason Reagan was shot) and a script from a couple of aging TV hacks. The plot revolves around the discovery of the USS Cygnus, missing for 20 years, now perched perilously close to the event horizon of the largest known black hole in the universe, mysteriously immune to the supposedly irresistible gravity. The crew of the rescue ship, The Palomino (lamest spaceship name ever!), boards the Cygnus to discover an army of very cheap-looking Stormtrooper-wannabe robots under the command of the only human on board, mad genius Dr. Hans Reinhardt, who believes his anti-gravity device will protect the Cygnus as he takes her (and the Palomino's crew) into the titular hole. The cast includes Maximilian Schell; Anthony Perkins; Robert Forster; Joseph Bottoms; Yvette Mimieux; Ernest Borgnine and the voices of Roddy McDowell and Slim Pickens as the C3PO and R2D2 of the movie. And of course, there was a "menacing" red, silent hoverbot also named Maximilian. Cheap, silly and loaded with some of Disney's worst dialogue, The Black Hole is a terrible movie:



Well, from those Sci-Fi geeks over at i09 comes the news that Disney has green-lighted a remake of the Black Hole from the team that is about to give us the long-awaited Tron sequel. Given that Disney had been in the business a lot longer than George Lucas and Stephen Spielberg, one might think they would have embraced the new technologies being created by folks like Douglas Trumball and Rick Baker. Instead, they skimped on bad physical effects and cartoonishly anthropomorphic robots. So, for the first time in a long time, comes happy news of a remake of a bad movie that should have better than it was. in the first place. It pleases me to say that I can get behind The Black Hole remake (it also makes me giggle 'cause it sounds so deliberately dirty, which it is). And trust me when I tell you how hard it was not to make more dirty jokes about this movie's title...

And since I went there (talk about segues), as I write this, there are 46 minutes left of World AIDS Day here on the East Coast. If you read me regularly, you know that I am a founding board member of the James Tolin Memorial Fund. We produce an annual benefit featuring a performance of an LGBT-themed comedy and a gala reception and silent auction to raise funds for local AIDS and Arts Education charities. And while it may be the "official" World AIDS Day, it saddens me to think that we need such a day. Every day should be "Stop Being a Selfish Prick and Do Something to Help Someone in Need Day."

Yes, the economy is bad. Yes, you all have bills to pay. So do I. I don't always have money to give. But I do have time. So skip the game next Sunday and deliver a meal to someone not only in need of food, but a smile and a friendly word or two. Attend a local fundraiser (you don't have to spend a whole lot of money) or start one of your own. Why should MLK Day be set aside as a Day of Service? If everyone did just one thing to help someone else, every day -- just one thing -- imagine how much nicer everyone's lives would be. At the risk of repeating myself: Think Globally; Act Locally. Donate. Volunteer. Take Action. Now.

Okay - the rant really is over, as is this day.

More, anon.
Prospero

Read More......

Sabtu, 05 September 2009

I Missed My Own Anniversary



I cannot believe that it's been more than a year since my first post here on Caliban's Revenge.



And I cannot believe that I missed my 1 year Anniversary. That's so typical of me.



Of course, at this point in my life, I keep track of my past based on what show I happened to be doing at the time.



My first post was on July 9th, 2008. I was about to start work on my production of Thornton Wilder's "The Skin of Our Teeth." I had no photos, no links and no embedded videos. It was just my own humble opinion.



Well, maybe not so humble.



Okay - my own very opinionated view of how I think the world should work.



Anyway, since it's been almost 14 months since I started sharing with the world, I thought it high time to re-share that first post, though this time with pictures and videos and and all the doo-dads I've learned to use since then. And maybe a little more insight into what I was feeling back then.



So, here is my updated version of Ten Fantasy/Horror/Sci-Fi Movies that Should Be Re-Made:



1. Something Wicked This Way Comes – The terrific Ray Bradbury novel (one of the first novels I learned to dissect and still one of my all time favorites) about a carnival of soul-stealing spectres who feed on fear, is diluted and dumbed-down in the Disney film adaptation starring Jason Robards, Peter Billingsly (A Christmas Story) and a then-unknown Jonathan Pryce. As a kid who loved carnivals (and an adult who still does), the novel both terrified and fascinated me. The superb BBC program "Torchwood" adopted part of its premise for an excellent season-two episode.





2. Ghost Story – Peter Straub's magnificently scary and disturbing novel was adapted into a less-than-satisfying movie in 1981, starring ancient film legends Fred Astaire, Melvyn Douglas; John Houseman and Douglas Fairbanks, Jr. It introduced American audiences to cult icon, Alice Krige (Star Trek's Borg Queen) and totally missed the point of Straub's complex story of ghostly revenge and the nature of true evil.





3. Fahrenheit 451 – Frank Darabount (The Mist; The Green Mile; The Shawshank Redemption) is scheduled to remake another Bradbury classic, originally adapted in 1966 by French auteur Francios Truffault as a stark and sterile vehicle for Julie Christie and Oskar Werner where, in a dystopian future, books are illegal and 'Firemen' are dispensed to burn caches of contraband literature. The original, while fascinating, is just a bit too 'artsy' to capture Bradbury's homespun story-telling style.







4. The Shining – Neither the Stanley Kubrick original, nor the Mick Garris-helmed TV version satisfyingly adapts Stephen King's terrifying novel about a haunted Colorado hotel and the alcoholic playwright who brings his family to spend a winter taking care of it. Kubrick's version is more about the nature of madness than a ghost story, while the TV version (written by King) is forced by the limitations of the medium (and the network censors to omit important details. The best version, though has to be this one.





5. Sisters – An early Brian DePalma film about formerly conjoined twins (played by Superman's Margot Kidder), one of whom is a psychopath. A fascinating premise, disappointingly executed on a very low budget.





6. Last House on the Left – Horror icon Wes Craven (The Hills Have Eyes; A Nightmare on Elm Street) made his name in the early 70's with this tale of a family's revenge against the men who raped their daughter. Famous for the tagline "Keep telling yourself: 'It's only a movie,'" Last House… is supposedly scheduled for an updated remake in 2009.*



*Update - the far inferior re-make was derided by critics and disappeared from theater screens faster than one can say "Jack Robinson."





7. The Exorcist – Yes, William Friedkin's amazing film adaptation of William Peter Blatty's novel was a sensation in its day (people literally fainted during screenings and lines formed for blocks) and can still scare the Faithful, but the advancement of CGI special effects make this story of a young girl possessed by a demon ripe for remaking. In the hands of the right production team, a remake could have people fainting, puking and lining up all over again.





8. The Haunting – The original 1961 film version of Shirley Jackson's novel "The Haunting of Hill House" is one of the most frightening movies ever made, all without its audience seeing a thing. And it features an astonishing performance by the always amazing Julie Harris. The execrable late-90's remake, directed by Jan de Bont, is simply an excuse to exploit CGI effects and the talents of actors Lily Taylor and Liam Neesom. A truly frightening remake is certainly in order.







9. The Hobbit – An animated version of J.R.R. Tolkien's prequel to The Lord of the Rings, made by Rankin/Bass Studios (best known for holiday stop-motion fare like Rudolf the Red-nosed Reindeer), confusingly reduces Tolkien's fantasy tale to its basest elements (and ends halfway through the story). Guillermo Del Toro (Hellboy; Pan's Labyrinth) has been signed to direct the live-action version, as well as a 'bridge' film which further connects the story to Peter Jackson's astonishing LOTR trilogy. Thankfully, Jackson is signed to produce both films, though I have no qualms about Del Toro's abilities as a director of fantasy fare.





10. Logan's Run – This 1970's cheesefest, based on the novel by William F. Nolan and George Clayton Johnson, won an Academy Award for Special Effects, but time has not been kind to the film which starred Michael York, Jenny Agutter, Peter Ustinov and the late Farrah Fawcett. Obvious miniature sets, bad robotic effects and terrible acting all add up to a Z-grade (at best) movie about a futuristic society which values youth above all. A faithful adaptation of the novel, aided by modern CGI FX, has been bandied about for years, with names like Schwarzenegger, Cruise and Pitt attached at various times. It is apparently scheduled for a 2010 release, according to IMDb.





There you have it; my first post, updated.* Keep reading and commenting. You know I love hearing from you. What movies would you like to see re-made?



More, anon.

Prospero



*Additional links added @5:17 PM

Read More......